Karianne’s Pet

Most of the images I’m sharing with you are digital pieces that I’ve done fairly recently. I have been at this a long time however, and I didn’t start using the computer for any visual aspect of my work until 2001. Here is the very first piece I did with Olduvai in mind back in 1995.

Karianne's Pet
Click here for a larger, more detailed image

This is acrylic paint on gesso-primed illustration board. As happened too often in the good old days, the pencil preliminary drawing for this took as long as the painting itself. Karianne was the daughter of friends and, as it turned out, a very expressive little model. I told her the idea behind the painting I wanted to do and she was simply great. Apparently, mom and dad knew she would be and just smiled.

Taking the photos of Karianne to work from was definitely the easy part. I now turned my attention to the animal in the painting. I had decided on Megistotherium (order: Creodonta, family: Hyaenodontidae), because it had to be big and potentially very dangerous, and I also wanted a creature that I hadn’t seen painted a hundred times before so I wouldn’t be influenced by somebody else’s art. What I had seen were a couple little Gumby silhouette illustrations of the animal with no attempts at detailing. I could approach my image with no visual baggage.

I haven’t researched it recently, but at the time, Megistotherium was known from only one massive 26-inch (65 cm) skull, the largest of any creodont, and larger than any known carnivore. There were, however, dental and post-cranial remains of another creodont of almost equal size, Hyainailouros. Hyainailouros (Megistotherium, it turns out, may well be a junior synonym of this genus)* was fairly long in body and tail with relatively short, robust limbs. With this information and a number of skeletal restorations of other hyaenodont genera to look at, it only took me about 15 sketches, 25 “sized” Xerox copies of various body parts, and half a bottle of aspirin to get the proper attitude and proportions I wanted for the pose.

Looking at the piece today, except for the feet being a bit too big, I’m still happy with the structure. But there are things I’d change in the more speculative soft tissue features. Megisto/Hyainailouros’ fossilized remains have been found in early Miocene deposits in North Africa and Europe. The climate at the time appears to have been milder than today and those look like cold-weather ears to me. And I have absolutely nothing on which to base the long spiky hair down the back. It looked ‘neat’ at the time, still does I think, but today I would leave it off.

As I was about to post this evening, I asked myself how would I portray this animal today. I have a natural history library that would be the envy of most small towns, so I dug out my books, skeletal photos and drawings and found some older sketches from a few years back. Between 8pm and 11pm this evening did the sketch below.

Megis...to...O.K., O.K., Hyainailouros
Click here for a closer look

This was done digitally on my Wacom graphics tablet. (Warning: Photoshop tool talk) I opened a blank screen in Photoshop and started as I always do, sketching very loose and rough with a thick brush (airbrush) tool in black. As soon as I had something worth keeping, I moved the “fill” bar in the layers menu to 25% opaque, making the black a very “thin” light gray. Dropping a new layer over the first, I worked again in black refining the drawing. I don’t like to worry about measuring any proportions until I have something that’s starting to look good to me. Reproportioning (very little in this case) was done on layer 3. This particular drawing is 5 layers deep. The wonderful thing about this technology is that when the drawing was done, my final measurements told me that massive skull was just a tad too massive. With the lasso tool I isolated the head, scaled it back 10%, and was able to blend it back into the rendering all in about a minute. If I’d thought of it earlier, I’d have saved all the layers. I promise to do that and show them all to you the next time I suddenly feel the need to sketch a critter.

Very briefly, creodonts were at first thought to be the ancestors of today’s meat eaters. It’s now believed that the two families in order Creodonta and the ancestors of order Carnivora evolved from the same or closely related Cretaceous insectivores shortly after the demise of the dinosaurs. There’s too much information and too many genera (for me) to go into without supporting visuals, so if you want more information today, you’ll have to go here or Google it . I promise to be visual-rich in the not-so-distant future. Until then it’s back to the drawing board, literally.

*Something strange happens when you work with people exclusively by email. The last few years I’ve seldom had to speak or hear the names of the animals I work on, I’ve only typed and read them. This being the case, I hope Megistotherium is indeed its own beast, because I know both how to pronounce the name and what it means. Hyainailouros on the other hand: I don’t know if I’d recognize the name if I heard it spoken, because I have no idea how to say it. For a guy who deals with the scientific names of prehistoric critters as much as I do, I’m awful. I’m pleading age, never having taken Latin or Greek, and having missed the whole hooked-on-phonics thingy.

The late Donald Savage, professor emeritus of paleontology at the University of California, Berkeley, and just a wonderful man, once told me with a smile, “If you’re having trouble with a name, just say it with authority!” That might work for emeritus professors, but let’s just say a fumbled pronunciation doesn’t hold any weight coming from me. (Would someone out there less linguistically challenged than I am want to take a shot at Hyainailouros?)

Cultural(?) insight: As I was painting Karianne’s Pet, I was working in the front window of a little natural history/outdoors shop in the resort town of Mammoth Lakes, California. I’d ask children watching me why the little girl in the painting was upset with her pet. Girls almost universally answered with something fairly benign like “He won’t give her a ride” or “He’s laying on her doll” or my favorite, “He peed on the carpet.” Boys, especially over the age of 6 or 7 were a different story. Quite often death and destruction reigned. “He ate the cat” or “He trashed the house” or even “He tried to eat MOM!” Don’t read too much into this, it was a fairly small sample.

23 Responses to “Karianne’s Pet”

  1. chris Says:

    That’s one beautiful creodont. I’m probably no less linguistically challenged than you, but I would take the component parts of Hyainailouros (gr. Hyaena-cat), and pronounce them as if they were English: Hy-een-ay-loo-ros. This seems to be the general convention with pseudo-Latin taxonomic names, e.g. Tyrannosaurus, Australopithecus… I think it’s a relic of the way Latin and Greek were taught before the 20th century, when words were just pronounced as if they were English, so that you got writs of HAY-bee-us Corpus, rather than HA-bay-ahs Corpus as a Roman might have said.

  2. DouglasG Says:

    “He ate the cat” - I love it! As always, good stuff.

  3. Greg Morrow Says:

    How does Megisto compare with Andrewsarchus? The latter is also a huge creodont known only from one meter-long skull; are we talking about the same critter?

    Terrific picture–Karianne and Her Creodont would make a great movie!

  4. Rexroth's Daughter Says:

    I like reading how you make art. It’s quite a journey. Wonderful painting of the young girl and the pet. I especially like her modern face and attitude and the ancient beast she is admonishing.
    I also really appreciate the Photoshop explanations. It is a great idea to someday post photos of each layer.

  5. OGeorge Says:

    Greg, I too have seen Andrewsarchus occasionally called a creodont but it isn’t. A much earlier animal than Megistotherium, it’s actually a member of a group of flesh-eating or omnivorous archaic ungulates, either a mesonychid, or an arctocyonid. Perhaps someone out there has the latest classification. For all those fearsome teeth in a skull that is indeed a yard long, Andrewsarchus, like the other members of these families, trotted around with little spatulate hooves on his toes. In the Paleocene and Eocene, evolution tried out some ways to fill up ecosystems that we would find very bizarre today.

  6. Hungry Hyaena Says:

    Terrific information, O’George, and your comment on Andrewsarchus is no less exciting. I look forward to your next installment!

  7. Sara Says:

    That is a fantastic picture!!! I am in love with the snout and the paws. Thank you!

  8. Jan Andrea Says:

    I asked my 5-year-old why she was upset with the critter, and he said “The bear (sic) is shy of the girl. He’s sad.” I tried to clarify — “He’s sad, so she’s upset?” and he said, “Yes.”

    He’s a strange kid, though.

    I am really enjoying your blog and the pictures! Thank you so much for sharing!

  9. Steve Ervin Says:

    Beautiful Carl!!!! My two Scotties would gladly try to take him on though! (At least briefly!)

  10. Greg Morrow Says:

    Carl, thanks for the clarification. I probably knew (for certain values of “know”) that A. was a mesonychid, but got confused.

    When you say M. had a skull “larger than any known carnivore”, you mean capital-C carnivore, Carnivora, right?

  11. Chawunky Says:

    I may be reading too much from my own experience with dogs into this, but the creodont looks like s/he’s honestly shamed, but too tired to register it much. Nice.

    And as a Star Trek fan, I can’t help but note the beast’s resemblance to the sehlat, a traditional Vulcan child’s pet. (-;

  12. OGeorge Says:

    Greg: Yes, Carnivora with a capital “C”

    Chawunky: I actually got the idea for the Megisto’s pose from my “too tired” old Akita, Miko. I’m not familiar with Sehlats.

  13. Jason Bontrager Says:

    Neatly surreal juxtaposition! Have you created anything else along these lines? Knight on Baluchitherium-back? Performing glyptodonts?

    Thanks for the great images.

  14. Alan Kellogg Says:

    Nice work indeed. Only a nine year old girl could be so bossy. :D

    As to her pet, I figure, what with his oversized paws, he’s not yet full grown. :lol:

  15. Alan Kellogg Says:

    Update: The picture in question is now being discussed on the S.M. Stirling mailing list.

  16. Maureen Lycaon Says:

    I love this piece. I love its strange fairy-tale-in-the-woods ambience. Maybe someone will be inspired to put out a children’s story for it; gods know we can use all the educational books on evolution we can get these days . . .

    Not to quibble, but might not Megistotherium also have spots or stripes, rather than a plain-colored hide? After all, back then there was a lot more tropical forest and woodland.

  17. Chawunky Says:

    One hopes Miko will make a painted cameo here eventually, OGeorge.

    I’m not familiar with Sehlats.

    Nor should you be. It’s just Star Trek. (-:

  18. neutrino_cannon Says:

    I remember seeing a dorsal view of the holotype skull in Rise of the Mammals (a darned good, if slightly dated book. The pictures are excellent!). Two things stood out:

    1) The skull is freaking huge. It was about twice as long as the grizzly and lion skulls next to it for comparison. I would have been tempted to extrapolate a larger size for the animal than you have.

    2) The zygomatic arch was gigantic, and not just in absolute terms. The zygomatic arches were proportionatly so large that the skull looked almost oval in the dorsal view. I took this to mean that the animal possesed enormous biting force, although I suppose it could just be that creodonts were different.

  19. Joao Rio Says:

    The correct pronnounce of Hyainailouros is hard to determinate. Taxonomic names have Latin spellings, but this names is fully Greek. If it was “Latinized”, it must be Hyaenaelurus.
    The Greek pronnounce was Hoo-y-nalooros, Greek “y” sounds like Latin “u”. If Latinized, “y” sounds like “i”.

  20. Lili Says:

    Lovely image! I came across this while researching the Megistotherium.
    It would make a lovely inspiration for a Fantasy/Childs book.
    I find the ‘big feet’ appealing kind of a puppy look.

  21. Karianne Says:

    Hi,

    I just found this online and I must say it is beautiful work. I also wanted to say my name is Karianne, exactly as you have it spelled…. Very Cool Name….

    xoxo,

    Karianne in Scranton, PA USA

  22. garrett Says:

    Very good painting. the animal looks so real and very hyeana like.

  23. tony Says:

    Awesome painting - painting in Mammoth Lakes is a very inspirational thing

Leave a Reply